The following video promos and literature are examples of propaganda and misinformation presented by mainstream media and agencies that are being manipulated and “bought” by the telecom industries. Refutations are in the works . . .
We can compete by building out this site:
True Wireless Health Facts sketches starting here . . .
FAQ | Experts | Media | Resources
OCR of the text in the images, above:
-
“The scientific consensus is that there are no known health risks from all forms of RF energy at the low levels approved for everyday consumer use.”
-
“There’s no evidence to support that adverse health effects in humans are cause by exposures at, under or even in some cases above the current RF limits.”
-
“Indeed, no scientific evidence establishes a causal link between wireless device use and cancer or other illnesses.”
-
“There is no convincing scientific evidence that the weak RF signals from base stations and wireless networks cause adverse health effects.”
— World Health Organization -
“Some people have expressed concern that living, working, or going to school near a cell phone tower might increase the risk of cancer or other health problems. At this time, there is very little evidence to support this idea.”
— American Cancer Society -
“There is no evidence to support that adverse health effects in humans are caused by exposures at, under, or even in some cases above, the current RF limits. Indeed, no scientific evidence establishes a causal link between wireless device use and cancer or other illnesses.”
— Federal Communications Commission -
“The totality of the available scientific evidence continues to not support adverse health effects in humans caused by exposures at or under the current radiofrequency energy exposure limits.”
— Food and Drug Administration -
“The scientific consensus is that there are no known health risks from all forms of RF energy at the low levels approved for everyday consumer use.”
-
“. . .we considered all possible adverse health effects. The only proven effect is that of heating of (parts of) the body, and the guidelines are set to such a low level that this will not occur if they are observed.”
-
In December 2019, the FCC reaffirmed — on a unanimous and bipartisan basis — that these safety standards “ensure the health and safety of workers and consumers of wireless technology,” and that “no scientific evidence establishes a causal link between wireless device use and cancer or other illnesses.”
-
“the existing safety limits for cell phones remain acceptable for protecting the public health”
-
” . . . there is no evidence to support that adverse health effects in humans are caused by exposures at, under, or even in some cases above, the current RF limits.”
-
“Indeed, no scientific evidence establishes a causal link between wireless device use and cancer or other illnesses.”
-
“In December 2019, the FCC reaffirmed — on a unanimous and bipartisan basis — that these safety standards “ensure the health and safety of workers and consumers of wireless and that “no scientific evidence establishes a causal link between wireless device use and cancer or other illnesses.”
-
“the existing safety limits for cell phones remain acceptable for protecting the public health.”